On 17 October 2019, the Tribunal of Rome withdrew a decision relating to a Dublin transfer to Latvia due to well-founded risk of inhuman treatment upon return.
Before arriving in Italy, the applicant spent nine months in Latvia where he claims that he was forced to live in a closed facility without access to legal support while his asylum proceedings were ongoing.
On 14 October 2019, the Slovenian Constitutional Court published its judgment finding that Article 10b of the Aliens Act, setting out measures of temporary suspension of the right to asylum, was contrary to the principle of non-refoulement.
On 4 October 2019, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) published its ruling concerning the removal of a Sri Lankan national from the United Kingdom despite established family ties.
On 10 October 2019, the European Court of Human Rights published its decision on the case of O.D. v Bulgaria (Application No. 34016/18) concerning an order for the expulsion of an applicant of international protection.
On 11 October 2019, the High Court of Justice (Administrative) published its judgment concerning the London Borough of Waltham Forest’s (LBWF) unlawful breach of its statutory duty to secure suitable accommodation under section 193 of the Housing Act 1996.
On 10 October 2019, the Swiss Federal Administrative Court published its ruling in the case E-6932/2017, concerning the expulsion of a family of international protection applicants.
On 10 October 2019, the first civil section of the Italian Supreme Court published its ruling compelling first and second instance trial judges to cite the country of origin information examined in a cases denying subsidiary protection.
On 10 October 2019, the High Court of Justice (Administrative) published its ruling concerning the appeal of an extradition order to Cyprus on the basis that it violated the applicant’s rights under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR).
On 8 October 2019, the European Court of Human Rights published its ruling on the case of S.B. and S.Z. v Russia (Application Nos. 65122/17 and 13280/18).
