Journal

The Case of the Administrative Arrangement between Greece and Germany: A tale of “paraDublin activity”?

Date: 
Monday, November 5, 2018

In mid-August 2018 Germany, Greece and Spain agreed on the sketchy details of the initial migration compromise deal that was reached on the sidelines of the EU Summit in Brussels late June 2018. In this context, the Ministers on Migration of Germany and Greece reaffirmed their commitment by exchange of letters, to work towards common European solutions and to avoid any unilateral measure with respect to migration and...

Summary land border expulsions in front of the ECtHR: ND and NT v Spain

Date: 
Wednesday, October 25, 2017

This journal contribution is to be read in conjunction with the EDAL case summary on ND and NT v Spain.

Introduction :

When ND and NT submitted their application to the European Court of Human Rights in February 2015, the latest Grand Chamber judgment on collective expulsions was Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy...

Applying the Dublin Regulation to the family reunification of unaccompanied children in the absence of official asylum claims

Date: 
Friday, August 11, 2017

1.      Introduction

In recent years, thousands of children in need of international protection have traversed the Mediterranean and entered Europe unauthorised and unaccompanied by a parent or responsible adult. Many enter in the hope of reuniting with family members already residing in Europe, seeking both family reunification and international protection under the...

The ECtHR Ruling in Ilias and Ahmed: ‘safe third country’ concept put to the test

Date: 
Thursday, April 13, 2017

On 14 March 2017 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgement in the case of Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary concerning two asylum seekers of Bangladeshi nationality who were detained at the border zone in Hungary and then subject to removal to Serbia. Although the judgement is not final yet (as Hungary could...

Looking like a cat, walking like a cat, sounding like a cat but actually being a dog: What the X and X judgment means for the scope of the EU Charter?

Date: 
Wednesday, April 5, 2017

An easy way out: the Court’s judgment in X and X

Saying that the X and X judgment was awaited with bated breath is an understatement. The referral of X and X’s case gave a window of opportunity to the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) to rule on whether EU law obliges States to provide a limited territorial visa (‘LTV’) on humanitarian grounds for those who risk treatment contrary to the...

The right to work for asylum seekers: Ireland’s prohibition on employment

Date: 
Wednesday, January 25, 2017

This article is to be read in conjunction with the EDAL case summary.

The right to work and access the labour market is integral to human dignity, individual autonomy and self-esteem. Studies show that accessing the labour market during an asylum procedure is not only beneficial for protection applicants themselves but also for the host society in terms of improving integration prospects and wider economic benefits...

Mirza and the application of the Safe Third Country concept under the Dublin Regulation: a foreboding of things to come?

Date: 
Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Introduction

The judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Mirza is a tightly constructed decision in response to a series of highly circumscribed questions posed by the Debrecen Administrative and Labour Court in Hungary. Given the very precise answers one may doubt the judgment’s utility, especially since the Court’s decision is completely detached from the context of the...