UK: Court of Appeal confirms that unaccompanied minor cases must be determined as “an issue of objective fact”.

Thursday, March 9, 2017

On 9 March 2017, the UK Court of Appeal in case Ali, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ano [EWCA Civ 138] dismissed an appeal by the Secretary of State against a High Court decision of 11 May 2016, which had found unlawful the detention of a Sudanese unaccompanied minor mistakenly considered as an adult by domestic authorities. The High Court ruled that to justify detention it did not suffice to “genuinely believe” or suspect at the time of the detention that the individual was an adult.
The Secretary of State had argued that the word “child” should be construed subjectively, meaning that whether or not the detainee is a child is dependent upon the reasonable belief of the immigration officer at the time of the decision to detain, which was rejected by the High Court. The Court of Appeal concurred with the High Court that the word “child” should be interpreted literally and objectively.


This item was reproduced with the permission of ECRE from the weekly ELENA legal update supported by the Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Funding Programme and distributed by email. The purpose of these updates is to inform asylum lawyers and legal organizations supporting asylum seekers and refugees of recent developments in the field of asylum law. Please note that the information provided is taken from publicly available information on the internet. Every reasonable effort is made to make the content accurate and up to date at the time each item is published but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by ECRE, the IRC or its partners.



Best interest of the child
Child Specific Considerations
Vulnerable person