Spain – High National Court, 26 January 2011, 144/2011

Country of Decision:
Country of Applicant:
Date of Decision:
26-01-2011
Citation:
144/2011
Court Name:
High National Court
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF version of SummaryPDF version of Summary
Headnote: 

This decision from the High National Court requested the Ministry of Interior to suspend the expulsion of Saharan citizens who lodged an appeal against the rejection of their asylum application. In the appeal, they submitted a precautionary (temporary) measure asking for the suspensive effect of the previous decision which would have resulted in their expulsion from Spanish territory.

Facts: 

On the 5th of January 2011 a small boat (patera) travelling from Western Sahara arrived at the coast of the Canary Islands, fleeing an uprising in the region of El Aaiún. Twenty-two Western Saharan citizens claimed asylum and five of those applications were accepted at the provisional admission procedure stage and 17 were rejected by the Ministry of Interior and a decision was made to remove them. This decision was appealed before the High National Court by means of a precautionary measure requesting the suspensive effect of the expulsion order based on the right to apply to remain in Spain pending the examination of the appeal.

The national police carried out the actions required to execute the expulsion of the applicants, however before they could, they had to wait for a decision from the High National Court could decide on the precautionary measure presented.

Decision & Reasoning: 

The High National Court requested the Ministry of Interior to suspend the process of expulsion of the applicants based on their request for a precautionary measure to suspend the execution of the decision appealed.

The High National Court stated that when an applicant requests a precautionary measure to prevent the execution of an expulsion order he is entitled to remain in the host country and in the facilities legally provided in such cases.

Outcome: 

The national police suspended the expulsion of the applicants while the appeal was still under examination.

Subsequent Proceedings : 

The High National Court refused to grant refugee status and ordered the expulsion of the thirteen applicants. As a last resort, thirteen Saharan asylum seekers lodged an appeal to the ECtHR alleging risk of suffering serious harm if the return became effective (Art 39 of the ECtHR Regulation).

The ECtHR decided to provide protection while the request was under examination and asked Spain to suspend the expulsion. The High National Court accepted the recommendation suspending the expulsion of the applicants.

Observations/Comments: 

This decision has a political influence: it is the first time the ECtHR intervened in a case of rejected asylum seekers’ expulsion from Western Sahara.