EDAL case summaries
The case concerns three unconnected Iranian nationals who unsuccessfully claimed asylum in the Republic of Cyprus then came to the UK where they made asylum claims. A further right to appeal remained with the Cypriot Supreme Court. The case is a challenge by the applicants to the SSHD’s refusal to decide their asylum claims substantively; certification of their asylum claims on safe third country grounds; and certification of their human rights claims as clearly unfounded.
The Court concluded that there was no real risk that the...
With this judgment, the General Assembly of CALL is trying to bring its case law in line with the M.S.S. judgment of the ECtHR.
The CALL set the conditions under which an appeal for suspension against an enforceable decision (an order to leave the territory) has automatic suspensive effect.
After a prima facie examination (in extreme urgency), the CALL decided that the applicant in this casehas a reasonable ground of appeal on the basis of Article 3 of the ECHR, as he gave sufficient indications of the concrete problems he was experiencing in Poland. The CALL derived...
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Accelerated procedure filterAccelerated procedure
- (-) Remove Effective remedy (right to) filterEffective remedy (right to)
- (-) Remove Request to take back filterRequest to take back
- Detention 2
- Dublin Transfer 2
- Effective access to procedures 2
- Procedural guarantees 2
- Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) 2
- Access to the labour market 1
- Assessment of facts and circumstances 1
- Final decision 1
- Health (right to) 1
- Inadmissible application 1
- Legal assistance / Legal representation / Legal aid 1
- Medical Reports/Medico-legal Reports 1
- Non-refoulement 1
- Obligation to give reasons 1
- Responsibility for examining application 1
- Return 1
- Safe third country 1
- Standard of proof 1
- Subsequent application 1