You are here
Home › Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) › Indirect refoulement › Netherlands ›EDAL case summaries
Country of Decision: Netherlands
Country of Applicant: Syria
Keywords: Assessment of facts and circumstances, Burden of proof, Inadmissible application, Indirect refoulement, Real risk, Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect), Safe third country, Stateless person
A decision by the State Secretary for Security and Justice (the “State Secretary”) of the Netherlands will be in violation of: (i) Article 3.37e of the Foreigners Regulation 2000 if such decision, regarding whether a country qualifies as a safe third country, is not based on several information sources; and/or, (ii) Articles 3.2 and 3.46 of the Dutch General Administrative Law Act on the basis that all decisions of the State Secretary are required to (a) be carefully prepared and (b) include a decisive motivation.
Date: 05-08-2016
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Indirect refoulement filterIndirect refoulement
- (-) Remove Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) filterRight to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect)
- Assessment of facts and circumstances 1
- Burden of proof 1
- Inadmissible application 1
- Real risk 1
- Safe third country 1
- Stateless person 1
Filter by date
- 10:00 PM 1
Filter by country of applicant
- Syria 1
Filter by country of decision
- (-) Remove Netherlands filterNetherlands