You are here
Home › Personal circumstances of applicant ›EDAL case summaries
Netherlands – Court of The Hague, 19 October 2020, NL20.15181, NL20.15183, NL20.15188 and NL20.15194
The reception conditions for beneficiaries of international protection in Bulgaria are such that they may face severe material deprivation due to “indifference” on the part of the authorities (cfr. CJEU, Ibrahim), potentially amounting to a violation of Article 3 ECHR / Article 4 CFREU.
When the State Secretary decides that a request for international protection is not admissible, because the applicants have refugee status in Bulgaria, it is not sufficient for him to refer to the principle of mutual trust between EU Member States and to...
The governmental authority is requesting an authorization to detain an immigrant after an alleged infraction of article 53 of the Organic Law 4/2000 in order to guarantee the enforcement of a possible return procedure. Following the procedures detailed in article 62 of said law, the Court assessed the particular circumstances of the case, including the risk of nonappearance and the possible existence of previous administrative sanctions of the subject, concluding that the lack of roots in the Spanish territory and the fact that he already filled in an asylum application...
Member States are required to revoke subsidiary protection on the basis of art. 19(1), if they find out that the conditions that led to the granting of status were never met, regardless of whether the incorrect assessment of facts leading to the status is imputable exclusively to the national authority itself
It is necessary to make a proportionality assessment with consideration of both the gravity of the crime committed by the applicant and the interests of society, and the applicant’s individual rights, particularly his right to private and family life under Article 8.
The Federal Administrative Court failed to fully assess the impact that the measure of removal would have on the applicant. The evolution of the applicant's conduct since the occurrence of the crime, the applicant’s deteriorating medical condition, and his social, cultural and...
The discretionary clause in Art. 17 II Dublin-III regulation might under certain circumstances oblige the member states to take charge of an applicant. This can be particularly the case, if the competence of the member state under chapter III of the Dublin-III regulation would not be given because of a deadline expiry the applicant had no influence on.
This appeal considered what the correct approach is to the assessment of medical evidence in asylum claims alleging torture. Hence, it was declared that decision-makers can receive assistance from medical experts who are able to offer an opinion about the injury inflicted. The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal and remitted KV’s appeal against the refusal of asylum to the Upper Tribunal for fresh determination.
The applicants’ personal circumstances and the general conditions in the country of origin have to be taken into account, when assessing whether an internal flight alternative exists. Relevant sources like the UNHCR guidelines have to be used. Otherwise this constitutes a significant procedural error.
CJEU rules on the correct processing of applications for international protection lodged separately by family members and the interrelationship between them.
Pages
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Personal circumstances of applicant filterPersonal circumstances of applicant
- Assessment of facts and circumstances 40
- Country of origin information 29
- Individual assessment 28
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 27
- Subsidiary Protection 26
- Persecution Grounds/Reasons 23
- Refugee Status 22
- Internal protection 21
- Credibility assessment 20
- Membership of a particular social group 16
- Well-founded fear 16
- Dublin Transfer 15
- Burden of proof 14
- Gender Based Persecution 14
- Vulnerable person 14
- Non-state actors/agents of persecution 13
- Real risk 13
- Child Specific Considerations 12
- Country of origin 12
- Persecution (acts of) 12
- Return 12
- Family unity (right to) 11
- Procedural guarantees 11
- Relevant Facts 11
- Political Opinion 10
- Standard of proof 10
- Effective remedy (right to) 9
- Medical Reports/Medico-legal Reports 9
- Previous persecution 9
- Religion 9
- Actor of persecution or serious harm 8
- Best interest of the child 8
- Protection 8
- Responsibility for examining application 8
- Detention 7
- Health (right to) 7
- Humanitarian considerations 7
- Individual threat 7
- Non-refoulement 7
- Reception conditions 7
- Relevant Documentation 7
- Family member 6
- Inadmissible application 6
- Indiscriminate violence 6
- Personal interview 6
- Serious harm 6
- Subsequent application 6
- Access to the labour market 5
- Duty of applicant 5
- Internal armed conflict 5
- Material reception conditions 5
- Obligation to give reasons 5
- Safe third country 5
- Accelerated procedure 4
- Dependant (Dependent person) 4
- Effective access to procedures 4
- Female genital mutilation 4
- First country of asylum 4
- Manifestly unfounded application 4
- Obligation/Duty to cooperate 4
- Residence document 4
- Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) 4
- Torture 4
- Unaccompanied minor 4
- Benefit of doubt 3
- Discrimination 3
- Family reunification 3
- Integration measures 3
- Race 3
- Refugee sur place 3
- Stateless person 3
- Trafficking in human beings 3
- Actors of protection 2
- Armed conflict 2
- Circumstances ceased to exist 2
- Exclusion from protection 2
- Final decision 2
- Indirect refoulement 2
- Legal assistance / Legal representation / Legal aid 2
- Nationality 2
- Request to take back 2
- Safe country of origin 2
- Sexual orientation 2
- Sponsor 2
- Accommodation centre 1
- Acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN 1
- Cessation of protection 1
- Country of former habitual residence 1
- Crime against humanity 1
- Delay 1
- Education (right to) 1
- More favourable provisions 1
- Request that charge be taken 1
- Revocation of protection status 1
- Serious non-political crime 1
- Temporary protection 1
- War crimes 1
Filter by date
Filter by country of applicant
- Afghanistan 22
- Syria 9
- Iraq 8
- Nigeria 8
- Russia 7
- Somalia 5
- Unknown 5
- Albania 4
- Iran 4
- Kosovo 4
- Pakistan 4
- Sudan 4
- Algeria 3
- Sri Lanka 3
- Azerbaijan 2
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 2
- Ethiopia 2
- Gambia 2
- Georgia 2
- Bangladesh 1
- Cameroon 1
- China 1
- Congo (DRC) 1
- Croatia 1
- Egypt 1
- Guinea 1
- Ivory Coast 1
- Lebanon 1
- Mali 1
- Morocco 1
- Namibia 1
- Niger 1
- Russia (Chechnya) 1
- Rwanda 1
- Ukraine 1
- United Kingdom 1
- Vietnam 1
Filter by country of decision
- Germany 22
- Austria 12
- United Kingdom 10
- France 9
- Belgium 4
- Slovenia 4
- Spain 4
- Denmark 3
- Italy 3
- Netherlands 3
- Sweden 3
- Switzerland 3
- Czech Republic 2
- Finland 2
- Greece 2
- Poland 2
- Hungary 1
- Ireland 1