You are here
Home › Obligation to give reasons › Request that charge be taken › Dublin Transfer › National Case law ›EDAL case summaries
Both applicants seek legal assistance and to register their application for asylum, which was previously refused by the Alpes Maritimes Prefect. The interim relief judge decided that the Prefect’s refusal to provide the individuals with an application form to register their application for asylum, notwithstanding their presence within the territory and contact with the police, amounted to a serious breach of the right to asylum.
The fact that Poland agreed to take charge of the asylum procedure of a whole family is, by itself, not a proper basis for an inadmissibility decision. The hierarchy of the criteria for determining the Member State responsible for the procedure on the merits, set out in Art 5(1) Dublin II Regulation, must be respected. In this case the husband and father of the family had already been admitted to the procedure on the merits and, therefore, Art 8 was applicable prior to Art 14.
Languages
Filter by case summary type
- (-) Remove National Case law filterNational Case law
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Dublin Transfer filterDublin Transfer
- (-) Remove Obligation to give reasons filterObligation to give reasons
- (-) Remove Request that charge be taken filterRequest that charge be taken
- Inadmissible application 2
- Procedural guarantees 2
- Responsibility for examining application 2
- Delay 1
- Effective access to procedures 1
- Family unity (right to) 1
- Legal assistance / Legal representation / Legal aid 1
- Material reception conditions 1
- Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) 1