EDAL case summaries
Country of Decision: Belgium
Country of Applicant: Romania
Keywords: Effective remedy (right to), Subsequent application
This case concerned subsequent applications for asylum. The Constitutional Court ruled that Art 50, (3) and (4) of the Belgian Aliens Law (current Art 51/8) should be interpreted in such a way that the possibility to lodge an appeal for suspension of that decision is only excluded in cases where the following three conditions are met:
(1) the applicant has filed an earlier asylum application that was refused;
(2) the applicant has had the opportunity to appeal this decision and to exhaust his legal remedies;
(3) the applicant is making an identical asylum application...
Date: 01-12-1994
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Subsequent application filterSubsequent application
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
Filter by date
- 12:00 AM 1
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Romania filterRomania
Filter by country of decision
- (-) Remove Belgium filterBelgium