EDAL case summaries
The proposed deportation of the applicant to Iran would violate Article 3 ECHR, and as she was prevented from having the merits of her claim examined due to non-compliance with procedural time limits, there was a breach of Article 13 ECHR. This was because she had no chance to challenge the decision on appeal, or access to a remedy with suspensive effect.
Applicant complained under Articles 2, 6, 13 and 14 of the Convention in relation to the death of her partner while in police custody.
The case involved a Sri Lankan asylum seeker whose application was rejected in Germany, and upon seeking asylum in the UK, was rejected on the basis of the Dublin Convention and that his application corresponded to Germany. The Court found no breach of a Convention obligation from the UK by its decision to remove him to Germany.
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Effective remedy (right to) filterEffective remedy (right to)
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 2
- Membership of a particular social group 2
- Credibility assessment 1
- Delay 1
- Gender Based Persecution 1
- Health (right to) 1
- Manifestly unfounded application 1
- Medical Reports/Medico-legal Reports 1
- Persecution (acts of) 1
- Personal circumstances of applicant 1
- Procedural guarantees 1
- Protection 1
- Real risk 1
- Refugee Status 1
- Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) 1
- Torture 1