EDAL case summaries
The right to have recourse to the courts as enshrined in the German constitution (Art. 19 ss. 4 GG) is to be assessed in a thorough and reliable manner if the right to physical integrity (Art. 2 ss. 2 GG and Art. 3 of the ECHR) is at stake. The courts only adhere to this obligation if they carefully assess the evidence brought to them by the applicant considering the specific context of a person who has been granted international protection in a third country.
The presumption that Italy remains in compliance with its EU and International Law obligations related to the reception and integration of asylum seekers and Beneficiaries of International Protection has not been rebutted. Asylum seekers and BIPs suffering from severe psychological trauma can be returned to Italy with no real risk of breaching article 3 ECHR, or 4 CFREU, since the Country's reception capacities have not been exceeded, while effective medical treatment is available under the same terms as to Italian nationals.
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Integration measures filterIntegration measures
- (-) Remove Responsibility for examining application filterResponsibility for examining application
- Accommodation centre 1
- Assessment of facts and circumstances 1
- Dublin Transfer 1
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
- First country of asylum 1
- Humanitarian considerations 1
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 1
- Material reception conditions 1
- Real risk 1
- Reception conditions 1
- Request that charge be taken 1
- Request to take back 1
- Return 1
- Safe third country 1
- Vulnerable person 1
Filter by country of applicant
- Afghanistan 1
- Eritrea 1
- Sudan 1
- Syria 1