EDAL case summaries
Country of Applicant: Sudan
Keywords: Accelerated procedure, Credibility assessment, Effective access to procedures, Effective remedy (right to), Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Legal assistance / Legal representation / Legal aid, Non-refoulement, Personal interview, Procedural guarantees, Refugee Status, Relevant Facts, Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect), Torture
The detention of asylum applicants may undermine their ability to claim asylum and that an ‘effective remedy’ requires an appeal with suspensive effect against refoulement in order to prevent irreparable harm, sufficient time to prepare the appeal and effective legal assistance and interpretation.
Date: 02-05-2012
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Effective remedy (right to) filterEffective remedy (right to)
- (-) Remove Procedural guarantees filterProcedural guarantees
- (-) Remove Relevant Facts filterRelevant Facts
- Accelerated procedure 1
- Credibility assessment 1
- Effective access to procedures 1
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 1
- Legal assistance / Legal representation / Legal aid 1
- Non-refoulement 1
- Personal interview 1
- Refugee Status 1
- Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) 1
- Torture 1
Filter by date
Filter by country of applicant
- Sudan 1
