You are here
Home › Relevant Documentation › United Kingdom › Standard of proof › Duty of applicant › Benefit of doubt ›EDAL case summaries
Country of Decision: United Kingdom
Country of Applicant: Sri Lanka
Keywords: Actor of persecution or serious harm, Benefit of doubt, Credibility assessment, Duty of applicant, Relevant Documentation, Standard of proof
The Tribunal reasserted the decision maker’s duty of confidentiality in considering documents produced in support of a protection claim. Where there is a needed to make an inquiry in the country of origin then written consent must be given by the applicant. Moreover, Article 22 of the Asylum Procedures Directive prohibits direct contact with the alleged actor of persecution. Additionally, the Refugee Convention requires that the authentication of a document is undertaken with a precautionary approach, namely whether an inquiry is necessary or should be framed in a specific manner and...
Date: 19-07-2017
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Benefit of doubt filterBenefit of doubt
- (-) Remove Duty of applicant filterDuty of applicant
- (-) Remove Relevant Documentation filterRelevant Documentation
- (-) Remove Standard of proof filterStandard of proof
- Actor of persecution or serious harm 1
- Credibility assessment 1
Filter by date
- 10:00 PM 1
Filter by country of applicant
Filter by country of decision
- (-) Remove United Kingdom filterUnited Kingdom