EDAL case summaries
When a refugee and their child apply for international protection, the Police Headquarters shall not make residence or parental relationship the conditions for submitting their application.
The official date of an Islamic marriage contracted in Syria needs to be determined with reference to Syrian law. An official notice by the Dutch Foreign Affairs Ministry’s states that “in the opinion of the Syrian authorities, the date set by the Sharia Court will be the official date of marriage.”
If according to the marriage certificate issued by the Sharia Court the marriage predates a sponsor’s entry into the Netherlands, it is sufficiently established that a valid marriage existed before this entry, also when registration before the Sharia...
Requests for family reunification must be examined even if the third-country national, who is a family member of an EU citizen who has never exercised his right of freedom of movement, is subject to an entry ban. Whether there is a relationship of dependency between the third-country national and the EU citizen and whether public policy grounds justify the entry ban must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
The fact that a person has been the subject, in the past, of a decision excluding him from refugee status cannot automatically permit the finding that the mere presence of that person in the territory of the host Member State constitutes a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society. A case-by-case assessment is necessary before a measure based on grounds of public policy or public security is adopted. This assessment includes weighing the threat against the protection of the rights of EU citizens and their...
§ 104 para. 13 S. 1 of AufenthG (Residence Law) impedes the claim of a person with subsidiary protection for the assessment of a case of non-refoulment referring to the situation in the state of origin according to § 60 Abs. 5 AufenthG and Art. 3 ECHR in order to enable family reunion due to the lack of a defensible interest.
The case concerns an application for the annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee which rejected the applicant’s previous application to overturn the decision of the Regional Asylum Office of Samos whereby he was denied international protection. The Court determined that the case was inadmissible, accepted the relevant justifications given by the Appeals Committee and rejected the application.
An asylum applicant who is below the age of 18 at the time of his or her entry into the territory of a Member State and of the introduction of his or her asylum application in that State, but who, in the course of the asylum procedure, attains the age of majority and is thereafter granted refugee status must still be regarded as a “minor” for the purposes of that provision.
The Appellant and the appellant’s children were applying for leave to remain in Sweden due to affiliation with their husband and father respectively who had been granted a permanent right of residency in Sweden as a refugee - despite them not being able to prove their identities. Due to the appellant’s lack of relevant documentation for her and the children, the court had to consider the circumstances in which a person can be granted alleviation of evidentiary burden in terms of proving their identity.
The Migration Court of Appeal granted the appeal and held that...
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Family member filterFamily member
- Family reunification 5
- Dependant (Dependent person) 3
- Family unity (right to) 3
- Individual assessment 3
- Best interest of the child 2
- Effective access to procedures 2
- Accelerated procedure 1
- Accommodation centre 1
- Acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN 1
- Assessment of facts and circumstances 1
- Crime against humanity 1
- Dublin Transfer 1
- Duty of applicant 1
- Exclusion from protection 1
- Female genital mutilation 1
- First country of asylum 1
- Gender Based Persecution 1
- Inadmissible application 1
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 1
- Integration measures 1
- Manifestly unfounded application 1
- Membership of a particular social group 1
- More favourable provisions 1
- Personal interview 1
- Political Opinion 1
- Procedural guarantees 1
- Relevant Documentation 1
- Residence document 1
- Return 1
- Safe third country 1
- Standard of proof 1
- Subsidiary Protection 1
- Unaccompanied minor 1
- War crimes 1
Filter by date
Filter by country of applicant
- Eritrea 3
- Syria 2
- Afghanistan 1
- Albania 1
- Armenia 1
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 1
- Croatia 1
- Guinea 1
- Kenya 1
- Lebanon 1
- Nigeria 1
- Palestinian Territory 1
- Russia 1
- Uganda 1
Filter by country of decision
- Germany 1
- Greece 1
- Italy 1
- Netherlands 1
- Sweden 1