EDAL case summaries
Country of Applicant: Russia
Keywords: Actor of persecution or serious harm, Burden of proof, Credibility assessment, Detention, Duty of applicant, Effective access to procedures, Effective remedy (right to), Individual threat, Non-state actors/agents of persecution, Persecution (acts of), Real risk, Refugee Status, Relevant Documentation, Relevant Facts, Standard of proof, Subsequent application, Well-founded fear
The Court found a violation of Article 3 in relation to a subsequent application for asylum, which had been rejected on the basis that it contained no new elements indicating that the Applicants ran a real risk of being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment on deportation to Russia. Because new information had in fact been provided, the national authorities were under an obligation to thoroughly review the information in order to assure themselves that the Applicants’ rights under Article 3 would be safeguarded.
Date: 19-01-2016
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Burden of proof filterBurden of proof
- (-) Remove Credibility assessment filterCredibility assessment
- (-) Remove Real risk filterReal risk
- (-) Remove Refugee Status filterRefugee Status
- Actor of persecution or serious harm 1
- Detention 1
- Duty of applicant 1
- Effective access to procedures 1
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
- Individual threat 1
- Non-state actors/agents of persecution 1
- Persecution (acts of) 1
- Relevant Documentation 1
- Relevant Facts 1
- Standard of proof 1
- Subsequent application 1
- Well-founded fear 1
Filter by date
- 11:00 PM 1
Filter by country of applicant
- Russia 1
