You are here
Home › Refugee Status › Congo (DRC) › Manifestly unfounded application › Ireland › Protection ›EDAL case summaries
Country of Decision: Ireland
Country of Applicant: Angola, Congo (DRC), Czech Republic
Keywords: Manifestly unfounded application, Persecution (acts of), Protection, Race, Refugee Status, Safe third country
The Court refused to give two Applicants, who had both been granted asylum by the Czech Republic, permission to seek judicial review of the Refugee Applications Commissioner’s (ORAC) decisions not to admit their asylum claims for consideration on the basis of section 17(4) of the Refugee Act 1996, and also refused similar relief sought in respect of subsequent Deportation Orders, which it was claimed were unlawful owing to the unlawfulness of the former decisions regarding the Applicants’ asylum claims.
The relevant section precludes the Minister from granting a declaration...
Date: 17-04-2013
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Manifestly unfounded application filterManifestly unfounded application
- (-) Remove Protection filterProtection
- (-) Remove Refugee Status filterRefugee Status
- Persecution (acts of) 1
- Race 1
- Safe third country 1
Filter by date
- 11:00 PM 1
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Congo (DRC) filterCongo (DRC)
- Angola 1
- Czech Republic 1
Filter by country of decision
- (-) Remove Ireland filterIreland