You are here

Home › Refugee Status › European Union Law › Subsidiary Protection › Integration measures ›

EDAL case summaries

CJEU - Case C‑713/17, Ayubi, 21 November 2018

Country of Applicant: Unknown
Keywords: Discrimination, Integration measures, Refugee Status, Subsidiary Protection, Temporary protection

Persons entitled to refugee protection should be accorded the same treatment regarding assistance as provided to nationals of the Member State. Article 29 Directive 2011/95 and Article 23 Geneva Convention do not make this treatment dependant on the length of the applicant’s stay in the Member State. 

A refugee may rely on the incompatibility of legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, with Article 29(1) of Directive 2011/95 before the national courts in order to remove the restriction on his rights provided for by that...
Date: 21-11-2018

CJEU - Joined Cases C‑443/14 and C‑444/14, Kreis Warendorf v Ibrahim Alo and Amira Osso v Region Hannover

Country of Applicant: Syria
Keywords: Freedom of movement (right to), Integration measures, Refugee Status, Subsidiary Protection

Article 33 of the Qualification Directive, read in conjunction with the Geneva Convention, requires Member States to allow persons to whom they have granted subsidiary protection status not only to move freely within their territory but also to choose their place of residence within that territory.  However, the Directive does not prevent beneficiaries of subsidiary protection status from being subject to a residence condition for the purpose of promoting their integration where said group of persons are not in a comparable situation as non-EU citizens. 
Date: 01-03-2016

Filter by case summary type

Filter by date

Filter by country of applicant