EDAL case summaries
Turkey’s continual and severe failure to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances of disappearance of Greek-Cypriots, who were at the time under the control of its agents, constituted a violation of Articles 2,3 and 5 of the ECHR. The circumscription of freedom of movement, religion and association of Greek-Cypriots in Northern Greece constituted violations of Articles 9 and 10 and the continual violation of Article 1 Protocol 1 by virtue of preventing Greek Cypriot owners from having access to, control and use of their property was also found by the Court.
Mrs Loizidou argued that the refusal by Turkish troops to allow her access to property she claimed to own in northern Cyprus violated her right to peaceful enjoyment of her property. The Court held that Turkey could be held responsible for what was a continuing violation of the right under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- Armed conflict 2
- Discrimination 2
- International armed conflict 2
- Nationality 2
- Race 2
- Acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN 1
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
- Family unity (right to) 1
- Final decision 1
- Freedom of movement (right to) 1
- Health (right to) 1
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 1
- Membership of a particular social group 1
- Persecution Grounds/Reasons 1
- Religion 1
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Cyprus filterCyprus