EDAL case summaries
1. A change of the destination country in a return decision by an administrative authority should be regarded as a new return decision requiring an effective remedy in compliance with Article 47 CFREU.
2. The national legislation providing for a safe transit country ground applicable in the present case is contrary to EU law.
3. The obligation imposed on a third-country national to remain permanently in a closed and limited transit zone, within which their movement is limited and monitored, and which the latter cannot...
This case concerned the concept of ‘safe country’ within the Dublin system and respect for fundamental rights of asylum seekers. The Court held that EU law prevents the application of a conclusive presumption that Member States observe all the fundamental rights of the European Union. Art. 4 Charter must be interpreted as meaning that the Member States may not transfer an asylum seeker to the Member State responsible within the meaning of the Regulation where they cannot be unaware that systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure and in the reception conditions of asylum seekers in that...
Languages
Filter by case summary type
- (-) Remove CJEU Case law filterCJEU Case law
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Safe third country filterSafe third country
- Material reception conditions 2
- Accommodation centre 1
- Detention 1
- Dublin Transfer 1
- Effective access to procedures 1
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
- Inadmissible application 1
- Non-refoulement 1
- Reception conditions 1
- Responsibility for examining application 1
- Return 1
- Subsequent application 1
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Iran filterIran
- Afghanistan 2
- Nigeria 1