EDAL case summaries
1. A change of the destination country in a return decision by an administrative authority should be regarded as a new return decision requiring an effective remedy in compliance with Article 47 CFREU.
2. The national legislation providing for a safe transit country ground applicable in the present case is contrary to EU law.
3. The obligation imposed on a third-country national to remain permanently in a closed and limited transit zone, within which their movement is limited and monitored, and which the latter cannot...
An asylum applicant can be sent to a Safe Third Country by a Member State who has admitted responsibility under Dublin III in the context of a take back request, where the applicant has left the responsible Member State before a decision on the first asylum application has been taken on its merits.
The absence of information being provided to the sending Member State by the receiving Member State on the latter’s legislation and practice regarding STC does not prevent an asylum applicant being sent to a STC or breach an applicant’s right to an effective remedy
Where an...
Languages
Filter by case summary type
- (-) Remove CJEU Case law filterCJEU Case law
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Detention filterDetention
- (-) Remove Safe third country filterSafe third country
- Accommodation centre 1
- Dublin Transfer 1
- Effective access to procedures 1
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
- Inadmissible application 1
- Material reception conditions 1
- Reception conditions 1
- Request to take back 1
- Return 1
- Subsequent application 1
Filter by country of applicant
- Afghanistan 1
- Iran 1
- Pakistan 1