You are here
Home › Health (right to) › Council of Europe Instruments › Effective remedy (right to) › Afghanistan ›EDAL case summaries
The ECtHR ruled that there had not been a violation of Article 5(1) ECHR in the applicant’s detention at the VIAL hotspot, a day after the entry into force of the EU-Turkey Statement. It also ruled that the threshold of severity required for their detention conditions to be considered as inhuman or degrading treatment had not been reached.
However, the ECtHR found that Greece violated the applicant’s rights under Article 5(2) by not providing them with detailed, understandable information about the reasons for their detention and the remedies...
Where negative reports regarding the reception conditions and inhuman or degrading treatment in a first country of asylum indicate that an Applicant may not be safe in such a country, an Applicant’s request to remain in a Member State pending a decision on their right to remain must be given the benefit of doubt and outweigh the public’s interest in immediate enforcement of the ordered transfer.
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Effective remedy (right to) filterEffective remedy (right to)
- (-) Remove Health (right to) filterHealth (right to)
- Detention 2
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 2
- Accommodation centre 1
- Benefit of doubt 1
- Dublin Transfer 1
- Effective access to procedures 1
- First country of asylum 1
- Integration measures 1
- Legal assistance / Legal representation / Legal aid 1
- Material reception conditions 1
- Personal circumstances of applicant 1
- Reception conditions 1
- Refugee Status 1
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Afghanistan filterAfghanistan
Filter by country of decision
- Germany 1