You are here
Home › 2016 › Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment › Guinea › Female genital mutilation ›EDAL case summaries
Country of Applicant: Guinea
Keywords: Effective remedy (right to), Female genital mutilation, Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
The Court held that there was no violation of Article 3 ECHR in the event of the applicant’s removal to Guinea because the applicant had failed to show a real risk of being re-excised in the event of her return to her country of origin. The Court also found that there had been no violation of Article 13 ECHR.
Date: 19-01-2016
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Female genital mutilation filterFemale genital mutilation
- (-) Remove Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment filterInhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
Filter by date
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Guinea filterGuinea