EDAL case summaries
Country of Decision: Poland
Country of Applicant: Russia
Keywords: Effective access to procedures, Refugee Status, Subsequent application, Subsidiary Protection
The Court ruled that when deciding whether the subsequent application is admissible, new facts regarding the individual situation of the applicant or her situation in the country of origin as well as change in the situation of the country of origin alone are significant. When examining whether the grounds of the first and the subsequent application are the same, the essence of the facts is important, not the manner in which they are presented.
With regard to the applicant’s argument that in the present case the legal grounds for granting subsidiary protection were not examined, the...
Date: 07-09-2015
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- (-) Remove Subsequent application filterSubsequent application
- (-) Remove Subsidiary Protection filterSubsidiary Protection
- Effective access to procedures 1
- Refugee Status 1
Filter by date
Filter by country of applicant
- (-) Remove Russia filterRussia
Filter by country of decision
- Poland 1