You are here

Home › Relevant Facts › European Union Law › EN - Recast Qualification Directive, Directive 2011/95/EU of 13 December 2011 › Procedural guarantees ›

EDAL case summaries

Error message

  • Notice: unserialize(): Error at offset 62 of 68 bytes in variable_initialize() (line 1202 of /var/www/web109/web/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Notice: unserialize(): Error at offset 2755 of 18711 bytes in variable_initialize() (line 1202 of /var/www/web109/web/includes/bootstrap.inc).

France - National Court of Asylum, 7 January 2016, Mrs S spouse of M and Mr M v Director General of OFPRA

Country of Decision: France
Country of Applicant: Kosovo
Keywords: Effective access to procedures, Personal interview, Procedural guarantees, Relevant Documentation, Relevant Facts, Subsequent application

A subsequent application is not admissible unless the interested party presents new facts or elements relating to his personnel situation or to the situation in his country of origin, out of which he could not have had knowledge of previously, and likely, if they have probative value, to modify the appreciation of the legitimacy or the credibility of the application of the interested party.

The director general of OFPRA was right to find that the elements that the applicants presented before him did not significantly increase the probability that they would meet the qualifying...
Date: 07-01-2016

Filter by case summary type

Filter by date

Filter by country of applicant

Filter by country of decision