On 12 December 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) published its judgment (case C-380/18) on the interpretation of the Schengen Borders Code 2016/399
The Supreme Administrative Court recently ruled (case no. KHO:2019:149) on an erroneous decision to deny international protection following an assessment based on the incorrect country of origin.
M.M v Greece (Application No.44408/18): The case concerns the detention of an applicant of international protection, a Syrian national, in Section B of Moria Hotspot from 29 August 2018 until 28 September 2018. They complain that the living conditions during and after detention were contrary to Article 3 ECHR.
The Committee of Ministers (CM) recently published its decision following the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) in the case of M.A. v France.
On 5 December 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion on Hungary’s provisions relating to the notion of a ‘safe transit country’ and domestic time limits for the judicial review of inadmissible applications in respect of LH v. Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-564/18).
On 5 December 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion on the interpretation of Article 46(3) Directive 2013/32 concerning guarantees of effective judicial protection and the use of mandatory time limits
On 4 December 2019, the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (the UT) published its judgment in JR/11283/2014 [2019] on the responsibility of processing asylum claims subject to Dublin III Regulation when an individual has left the EU.
On 4 December 2019, the Court of Appeal (the Court) published its judgment on the appeal of a deportation order to Nigeria in the case of Akinyemi v the Secretary of State [2019] EWCA Civ 2098.
On 3 December 2019, the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) published its judgment on the risk of ill treatment in the event of extradition to Uzbekistan.
