• The blog aims to demonstrate that the system of self-identification of vulnerable persons in the international protection proceedings, applicable in Poland prior to the transposition of the recast Procedure and Reception Directives, can give rise to breaches of Article 5 of the ECHR. It also examines the possible impact of the post-transposition legal framework in Poland on detention practices for those who are vulnerable.

  • The navigation and use of Country of Origin information by the European Court of Human Rights has been, up until now, a relatively unexplored area. This blog, however, examines in depth how the ECtHR has established a specific framework on the use of COI in its own case law, namely the collection, assessment, and determination of COI. Whilst this framework has been created by the Court itself it rarely abides by it, leading to a COI methodology which is porous and contradictory and a judgment which determines the fate of the individual as well as State practice elsewhere.

  • ECRE has published its analysis on the European Commission's proposals to reform the Common European Asylum System. All legislative proposals; Dublin Regulation IV, Asylum Procedures Regulation, Qualification Regulation, Reception Conditions Directive, EASO Regulation, EURODAC Regulation and the Regulation establishing a Union Resettlement Framework have been commented upon by ECRE and can be found on EDAL's resources page. 

  • In his Opinion, the Advocate-General found that a Member State may not detain an applicant for international protection awaiting his or her transfer to another Member State, where the legislation of the first Member State has not defined objective criteria for assessment of a significant risk that a foreign national may abscond, even if such criteria follows from the judicial and administrative practice of that Member State.

  • The CALL ordered the Aliens Office to grant humanitarian visas to a Syrian family within 48 hours. As the Aliens Office refused to execute this CALL decision, the Tribunal of First Instance has issued a fine on the State of €1000 per person per day until the decisions are properly executed.

Latest News

Belgium: CALL recognises Kurdish woman in Turkey who has been victim of domestic violence as a refugee

Monday, November 28, 2016

This case concerns a Turkish woman of Kurdish origin who suffered severe ill-treatment by her husband and persecution by her own family in Turkey. After she obtained a divorce from her husband, she received death threats from him and was rejected by her own family. She went to Belgium, where her application for regularisation was rejected. In 2007 she married a man in Belgium at the consulate of Turkey.

Communicated case: A.M. v. Austria (no. 32830/15), communicated on 6 November 2016

Sunday, November 6, 2016

On 6 November 2016, the European Court of Human Rights communicated the case A.M. v. Austria (no. 32830/15), which relates to the Dublin transfer of a Somali national, who was granted subsidiary protection in Italy, from Austria to Netherlands. The applicant’s wife and child live in Austria.

Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta (nos. 25794/13 and 28151/13) [Articles 3 and 5], 22 November 2016

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

On 22 November 2016, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta (nos. 25794/13 and 28151/13) concerning the eight-month detention of two asylum-seeking children pending the outcome of their asylum procedure and, in particular, the age assessment procedure employed.

Latest Cases

Country of Decision: Finland , Country of Applicant: Thailand , Keywords: OIkeus perheen yhtenäisyyteen, Perheen jäsen, Perheen yhdistyminen , Date of Decision: 30-12-2011

Oleskelulupaviranomainen ei myöntänyt oleskelulupaa perhesiteen perusteella, koska epäilivät ns. lumeavioliittoa. Asiassa oli kyse siitä, voitiinko oleskelulupahakemus perhesiteen perusteella hylätä maahantulosäännösten kiertämisen tavoittelun perusteella, kun oleskeluluvan muut edellytykset täyttyivät.

Country of Decision: Finland , Country of Applicant: Somalia , Keywords: Suojelusta poissulkeminen, Toissijainen suojelu , Date of Decision: 18-02-2014

Asiassa oli kyse siitä, voitiinko poissulkemislausekkeen perusteella jättää myöntämättä kansainvälistä suojelua henkilölle, jota epäiltiin törkeästä rikoksesta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että toissijainen suojelu voitiin kieltää henkilöltä, jota epäiltiin törkeästä raiskauksesta.

Country of Decision: Finland , Country of Applicant: Bulgaria, Iraq , Keywords: OIkeus perheen yhtenäisyyteen, Palaa, Vastuu hakemuksen käsittelystä , Date of Decision: 22-11-2013

Ulkomaalaislain 51 §:n mukaan Suomessa olevalle ulkomaalaiselle myönnetään tilapäinen oleskelulupa, jos häntä ei tilapäisestä terveydellisestä syystä voida palauttaa kotimaahansa tai pysyvään asuinmaahansa taikka hänen maasta poistamisensa ei ole tosiasiassa mahdollista.

Asiassa oli kyse siitä tarvitaanko ulkomaalaislain 51 § nojalla myönnettävän tilapäisen oleskeluluvan edellytysten tutkimista varten täytäntöönpanokelpoinen käännyttämispäätös vai tuleeko Maahanmuuttoviraston selvittää henkilön maasta poistamisen tosiasiallisia mahdollisuuksia ennen käännyttämispäätöksensä tekemistä.

About EDAL

The European Database of Asylum Law (EDAL) is an online database co-ordinated by the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) and a compilation of summaries of refugee and asylum case law from the courts of 19 EU Member States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The summaries are published in English and in the relevant Member State’s national language.

For more information please see here.

If you are interested in contributing an article on a relevant subject to the EDAL blog or would like to inform us about an important national judgment, please kindly send an email to Amanda Taylor (ataylor@ecre.org) or Julia Zelvenska (jzelvenska@ecre.org).