You are hereHome ›
Court of Justice: AG opinion in Case C-290/14 Celaj, 28 April 2015
Case C-290/14 (Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of an illegally staying third-country national — Articles 15 and 16 — National legislation providing for a prison sentence on an illegally staying third-country national in the event of re-entry — Compatibility)
The Advocate General Szpunar delivered an opinion on a question referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union by the Court of Florence. The referred case concerned an Albanian national, Mr Celaj, who had been given a suspended sentence in Italy in 2011 for attempted robbery, and later being given deportation order accompanied by a ban on re-entry to Italy for three years. Mr Celaj voluntarily left the national territory in 2012, only to subsequently re-enter, where he was apprehended in 2014. The public prosecutor sought a sentence of imprisonment for this breach of the re-entry ban.
The Court of Florence asked the CJEU to rule on the compatibility of a national criminal law sanction with the provisions of Directive 2008/115 on the repatriation of third-country nationals unlawfully residing in an EU country. It was noted that, with the aim of the directive (as stated in Article 1) being to return illegally staying third-country nationals, Member States are under a constant duty to begin a return procedure, and to issue a return decision; a measure penalising non-compliance with an entry ban cannot jeopardise the overriding objective, which is to say the imprisonment cannot jeopardise a future return procedure.
With the imprisonment of a person ultimately delaying a future return, Advocate-General Szpunar concluded that the directive must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from imprisoning a third-country national solely on the basis of that person re-entering the territory of that Member State in defiance of an entry ban that had been issued with a return decision under the directive.
30 April 2015
This item was reproduced with the permission of ECRE from the weekly ELENA legal update supported by the Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Funding Programme and distributed by email. The purpose of these updates is to inform asylum lawyers and legal organizations supporting asylum seekers and refugees of recent developments in the field of asylum law. Please note that the information provided is taken from publicly available information on the internet. Every reasonable effort is made to make the content accurate and up to date at the time each item is published but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by ECRE, the IRC or its partners.