UK - Upper Tribunal, 20 June 2011, MT (Ahmadi - HJ (Iran)) Pakistan  UKUT 00277 (IAC)
European Union Law > EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 > Art 4 > Art 4.4
European Union Law > EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 > Art 10
European Union Law > EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 > Art 10 > Art 10.1 (e)
The guidance in HJ (Iran) (see separate summary in this database) should be applied, by analogy, in cases where the applicant feared persecution on account of their religion. Consequently, the Tribunal had to consider the reason why an Ahmadi applicant for asylum had modified his behaviour by preaching only to people who would not put him at risk of persecution.
The applicant was a devout Ahmadi from Pakistan. Trying to convert people to his religion was a criminal offence. The Tribunal accepted part of his account; in particular that he had written three books on his faith. The First Tier Tribunal held that he preached his faith, but only in private to friends and family. He had also preached openly when he was abroad. It considered the current country guidance and found that “the risk is well below that necessary to engage international protection” and dismissed the appeal. The applicant appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
It held that the first question was to decide whether the applicant was a devout Ahmadi. As this had been accepted, the second question was to ask whether he would be persecuted if he preached openly. The Tribunal found that he would be persecuted, referring to the current country guidance. The third question to ask was what he would be do on return. The Tribunal held that he would continue to preach to people who were “not dangerous” because of the fear of persecution that he had of preaching openly. It continued to hold that there was no prospect of him relocating to Rebwah because, he would still be at risk there if he preached to “dangerous persons”. It allowed the appeal.
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ("Istanbul Protocol"), 2004, HR/P/PT/8/Rev.1
Craig Administrative Law 5th Ed. (2003) ch 13.
UK - Patterson v London Borough of Greenwich  26 HLR 159
UK - R (Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department  QB 36;  2 All ER 905
UK - Court of Appeal, 18 November 2010, RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 1285
UK - Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside MBC  AC 1014
UK - Nadarajah & Amirthanathan v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 1768
UK - ID & Ors v The Home Office  EWCA Civ 38
UK - Court of Appeal, 14 July 2003, B (R on the application of) v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Merton  EWHC 1689
UK - Supreme Court, 7 July 2010, HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department  UKSC 31
UK - IA (Pakistan) CG  UKAIT 00088
UK - AB and DM (DRC) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, CG  UKIAT 00118